The Patent Office also invoked

The law views sex toys negatively and has never engaged positively with Mattress Jacquard Fabrics Manufacturers the notion of sexual pleasure.For a country so steeped in sexual taboos, yet another decision by the govement only highlights the lack of discourse regarding sexual health and wellness of the people."As a doctor, we have had women who are absolutely frightened with the concept of sex."When you ask a society to specifically not indulge in a certain act, it further instigates people to get involved in it. It’s the same thing here. Mostly these are considered to be morally degrading by the law. It is in these situations that we help patients out with sex toys to deal with the hesitation," he says, adding, "Sexual pleasure is a very intimate and personal matter.In a country that still largely deals with sex education in hush-hush tones, and with the ever rising growth in population and everyday sexual atrocities against women, it baffles why the govement is not trying to promote a safe environment for sexual health discourse."Sociologist Shiv Visvanathan says that decisions like these by the govement can be tagged as censorship, but he adds that this will not help in curbing the sexual health discourse as the govement plans. It is not advisable for the govement to intrude upon the private lives of their citizens." 

The Patent Office also invoked the IPC 377 to justify that a sex toy would be considered under the umbrella of ‘unnatural sex’. To top it off, India is a country with minimal sex education, and to constantly suppress voices that want to destigmatise sexual health, pleasure and wellness is unacceptable," he says. Pain and taboo about sexual health leaves them in an uncomfortable position. And if the step itself was not shocking enough, the Patent Office reportedly justified its decision by calling the sex toy, We Vibe, ‘a cause for obscenity and moral deprivation’. The Indian Patent Office recently refused the patent of a sex toy by Canadian company, Standard Innovation Corporation. You ban these sex toys now, they will find a different route to become a part of the market without regulation.In an official statement, the Office said, "These are toys that are not considered useful or productive.. But by no means does he support any step of the govement to obstruct any form of conversation regarding sexual health and wellness.Dr Rahul Reddy, sexologist, is of the opinion that apart from the concept of ‘moral fabric’, a sex toy may reduce physical human interaction.